Skip to main content

Our work

Work our team has deliveredSee the note on who delivered this work, with the numbers.

Five projects in wholesale, construction, property and shipping software. Each shows what changed, how it was built and what it measured. Client names stay private.

Book a 30-minute call→See the work ↓
reduction in order-to-dispatch cycle

30%

reduction in order-to-dispatch cycle

reduction in total tender response time

60%

reduction in total tender response time

of identified procurement-margin leakage recovered

58%

of identified procurement-margin leakage recovered

analytics query throughput

10×

analytics query throughput

Productiondeployed, not piloted
Privateno client names or identifying details

/01 · Five projects

What changed, how it was built, and the numbersSee the note on who delivered this work.

Each project started by putting a figure on the problem. Select one to see the result, the technology and the timeline.

WHOLESALE AND DISTRIBUTIONWholesale distributor · 8 branches

30%

reduction in order-to-dispatch cycle · ~12% inventory reduction from a better forecast

The order process fixed first, then eight branches moved onto one ERP

Order-to-dispatch cut by 30%. Our team fixed the order process first, then moved eight branches onto Dynamics 365 Business Central with automated order intake.

Stack
Dynamics 365 Business Central · Power Automate · Microsoft Fabric · demand forecast
Timeline
10 months · process, cutover, stabilise, automate
SOURCESONE INTAKEFABRICDISPATCHFORECASTEMAILPHONEEDIPORTAL
Illustrative

Some of this work was delivered by Reenva's founder and team before Reenva was formed. Client names and identifying details stay private.

/02 · How the work was done

Four rules behind every result on this page.

  1. /01

    Fix the process before the software.

    Each project started with how the work really flowed. Systems changed only once the process was right.

    Process first

  2. /02

    Put a number on the problem first.

    The cost was measured from the company’s own data before any build. Then the company decided whether the build was worth it.

    Measure, then decide

  3. /03

    Data first, AI on top.

    An agent built on broken data gives fast, confident, wrong answers. So the data was fixed before any AI went live.

    No AI on data that isn’t ready

  4. /04

    Judged by what staff do differently.

    Success meant a rep, planner or manager worked differently after go-live. A dashboard nobody opens doesn’t count.

    Changed work is the measure

/03 · Confidentiality and next steps

Client names stay private. The results don't.

These projects touched forecasts, margins, supplier contracts and pricing. So client names and identifying details stay off this page. The same applies to your business.

Want to know whether a result could apply to you? Ask on a 30-minute call. We will walk you through the project closest to yours.

/04 · In their words

What clients said about the work our team delivered.

Short lines from people at companies our team has worked with, named by role and industry only.

“We’d tried to replace this ERP once before and walked away. It worked the second time because they spent the first month on our floor, not in a config screen. They fixed how we work, then made the software match it.”
— Managing Director · Wholesale and distribution
“We used to decide which tenders to even attempt based on who had a free afternoon. Now the first draft is waiting when we sit down. The judgement is still ours — we just get to spend it on the part that wins.”
— Head of Business Development · Construction subcontractor
“The work we'd been doing in spreadsheets for ten years suddenly had a line on the P&L. That was the moment the board stopped asking what AI was for.”
— CFO · Wholesale horticulture
“We used to spend Tuesday building the view and Wednesday acting on a version of it that was already old. Now the view builds itself and we spend the time deciding. That’s the whole difference.”
— Managing Director · Property development
“We had the data for years. What we didn't have was a way to put it in front of our customers that wasn't a screenshot or a CSV. Six months later it's an endpoint they pay for.”
— Chief Technology Officer · Shipping software

/05 · Your next step

Find out what this kind of work could change for you.

Book a 30-minute call →

If there is a fit, a two-week fixed-fee review follows, ending in a clear go or no-go.